LS Review

See what the product is really asking you to rely on.

LS Review is an independent, evidence-backed examination of a long-term financial product: what it promises, what can change, what it costs or restricts, who stands behind it, and what the evidence actually supports.

Start with what is in front of you.

An LS Review can begin with an illustration, proposal, disclosure, contract, rider, or simply the product and issuer.

LS Review — interactive question, live app

A question from the LS Review app: how much growth must the product earn just to overcome its recurring costs, with adjustable sliders for return, fund expense and time, and a computed ten-year difference in ending value.

Fig. 01

From the live LS Review app, still in development

Representative configuration · product/reference context, not a page to reproduce

The work

The documents are the starting point, not the answer.

Longevity Standard combines transaction-specific materials with independent product, company, and source research.

What you provide

Illustration

Proposal

Contract

Disclosure

Rider

What we add

Product forms and versions

Company records

Source documents

Current product terms

Independent analysis

LS Review is the interpretation of both.

Inside the Review

What the Review examines.

01

What is promised

What the product actually commits to provide.

02

What can change

Rates, settings, conditions, and discretion that may vary over time.

03

Costs and access

What reduces value, what you are paying for, and when money may be difficult or expensive to reach.

04

Conditions of delivery

What must happen before particular benefits or values are available.

05

Who stands behind it

The institution responsible for the obligation.

06

What the evidence supports

What can be established, and what remains uncertain.

The method

Establish what applies. Then examine how the product works.

  • Establish what applies.

    Contracts, forms, riders, company records, and transaction-specific materials are not interchangeable.

  • Separate what is established from what can change.

    Different claims deserve different levels of confidence.

  • Follow value from commitment to delivery.

LS Review — method screen, live app

Four analytical questions from the LS Review app: the core economic job, recurring friction, what counts as cash, and value discovered late.

Fig. 02

The same discipline applied to a real configuration

From the live LS Review app, still in development

Evidence

Not every important question can be answered the same way.

What holds

Established — supported by applicable evidence

Guaranteed — contractually fixed within the relevant scope

Current product terms — as filed and in force at review

What is still open

Changeable — subject to reset, discretion, or future rates

Conditional — dependent on elections, timing, or behavior

Unresolved — important, but not yet established

Follow the product from commitment to delivery.

  • 01

    What is being promised?

  • 02

    What does the buyer give up?

  • 03

    What can reduce or constrain value?

  • 04

    What can change?

  • 05

    What conditions matter?

  • 06

    Who is responsible for delivery?

  • 07

    What does the evidence establish?

What If

Some questions cannot be answered by the contract alone.

LS Review establishes the product, the terms, and the evidence. What If explores how changing future conditions could matter — try the same recurring-cost question this page opened with.

Explore What If

Explore a mechanism, not a prediction.

4.00%
Ending value before recurring costs

reaches you absorbed by costs

Of the growth taken by recurring costs

At 6% it was . Recurring costs are charged on the balance, not on the return, so they don’t fall when returns do.

$100,000 over ten years with 3.38% of recurring costs — the same configuration as the specimen above. Constant return, no withdrawals. This is a mechanism, not a prediction.

Boundaries

Understand the product. Keep the decision.

  • LS Review does not tell you whether to buy, keep, replace, surrender, or avoid a product.
  • It does not determine personal suitability, risk tolerance, or financial-plan fit.
  • It does not rank products or tell you which one is “best.”

We evaluate the product, not the person.

Independent by design

The economics are tied to the analysis.

Our economics are tied to doing the analysis, not to which product is chosen, how much is purchased, or whether a transaction takes place.

That lets the work stay focused on the people and institutions relying on the product.

Current offer

Independent LS Review, $249

A focused, independent review of an annuity or supported long-term income product.

  • Evidence-backed Review

  • Interactive web report

  • Downloadable PDF

  • Human-reviewed before release

Request a Review

See the product more clearly before you decide what to do.

Tell us the product you are considering, or share the materials you received.